NULL
Illustration
Object:
The very difficult story about God commanding Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac and then at the last minute providing another sacrifice has puzzled biblical scholars for generations. Leonard Sweet in his book Out of the Question, into the Mystery gives an explanation that I have not heard of before; a view that at least makes one reflect more intently on the passage.
Sweet bases his theory upon a Jewish midrashic interpretation that argues that God never wanted Abraham to kill Isaac and was hoping that Abraham would argue with God and ultimately refuse to carry out the directive.
Sweet sees Abraham filling out a two-part examination. He passes the Obedience test, the objective part of the exam. He was willing to obey God even though the command went against everything he knew about God. But in the essay part of the exam, God expected Abraham to plead his case for Isaac.
Sweet bases his theory upon a Jewish midrashic interpretation that argues that God never wanted Abraham to kill Isaac and was hoping that Abraham would argue with God and ultimately refuse to carry out the directive.
Sweet sees Abraham filling out a two-part examination. He passes the Obedience test, the objective part of the exam. He was willing to obey God even though the command went against everything he knew about God. But in the essay part of the exam, God expected Abraham to plead his case for Isaac.

